@article { author = {Ehsani Nik, Malihe}, title = {Comparison Of 13thAD Logicians' Point Of View And Gelenbevi In Theory Of Syllogism}, journal = {Philosophy}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, pages = {121-137}, year = {2014}, publisher = {University of Tehran}, issn = {2008-1553}, eissn = {2716-974X}, doi = {10.22059/jop.2014.50262}, abstract = {The traditional logician’s explanation on categorical syllogism, make the analysis of controversial syllogism and other relative syllogism, very difficult. The thirteenth century logicians use two methods to solve this problem. One method is Ibn Sina's method, which adds a premise to syllogism, and the second method is Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Katebis’ method, which provide syllogism relying on middle terms and without adding a premise. In eighteenth century, Gelenbevi tried to find another way of closer justification on these syllogisms, by using other analysis on relative syllogism.The traditional logician’s explanation on categorical syllogism, make the analysis of controversial syllogism and other relative syllogism, very difficult. The thirteenth century logicians use two methods to solve this problem. One method is Ibn Sina's method, which adds a premise to syllogism, and the second method is Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Katebis’ method, which provide syllogism relying on middle terms and without adding a premise. In eighteenth century, Gelenbevi tried to find another way of closer justification on these syllogisms, by using other analysis on relative syllogism.}, keywords = {Syllogism,controversial syllogism,relative syllogism}, title_fa = {مقایسةآرای منطقدانان قرن سیزدهم میلادی و گلنبوی در طرح قیاس}, abstract_fa = {تفسیر منطقدانان سنتی از قیاس حملی به گونه‌ای است که آنها را در تحلیل قیاس مساوات و سایر قیاس‌های متضمن نسبت، با مشکل روبرو می‌کند. منطقدانان قرن سیزدهم میلادی برای بیرون رفتن از این مشکل دو شیوه را بکار می‌بندند. یک شیوه، همان شیوة ابن‎سینا است یعنی اضافه کردن یک مقدمه به قیاس و شیوه دوم، راه حل فخررازی و کاتبی است که بدون اضافه کردن مقدمه‌ای و با تکیه بر حدوسط شرایط انتاج قیاس را فراهم می‌کنند. کلنبوی در قرن هجدهم سعی می‌کند با تحلیل دیگری از قیاس‌های متضمن نسبت، راهی را برای توجیه دقیق‌تر این قیاس‌ها باز کند.}, keywords_fa = {Syllogism,controversial syllogism,relative syllogism}, url = {https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_50262.html}, eprint = {https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_50262_18211d1fe82df469409aeca9916b1acd.pdf} }