ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Adorno and Foucault’s Philosophical Encounters with Modernity:
Designing Inter-Discursive Models
The current study investigates the concept of modernity in Theodor Adorno and Michel Foucault’s opuses and emphasizes that each of these philosophers has his specific conceptions of modernity. Therefore, after defining continental philosophy as a “discourse”, and explaining the problems of investigation, we will study this concept separately for Adorno and Foucault. Finally, as comparison and conclusion, we will design ontological, epistemological and paradigmatic models for these philosophers and present them here for the first time. As it will be shown, the fundamental elements that construct ontology and epistemology of modern human are, for Adorno, totality and identity, and for Foucault, bio-power and finitude. The heterogeneity of one discourse’s constituting elements will perfectly appear in paradigmatic models; based on the levels of knowledge, we will show while Adorno has “direct” philosophical and paradigmatic encounters with modernity and his theoretical encounter is an “indirect” one, Foucault has “indirect” philosophical and paradigmatic encounters and “directly” enters to the reality from theory, i.e. from the most concrete level of knowledge.
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62969_de115eee03bab263a75e46fad2239ab1.pdf
2017-02-19
1
25
10.22059/jop.2017.210226.1006195
Modernity
Identity
the One
Sovereignty
bio-power
finitude
g
j
jjahangiri@gmail.com
1
دانشیار بخش جامعهشناسی دانشگاه شیراز آدرس پستی: استان فارس، شیراز، میدان ارم، دانشگاه شیراز، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، بخش جامعهشناسی کدپستی: 7194685115
LEAD_AUTHOR
Ali
Bandarrigizadeh
ali.bandarrigizadeh@gmail.com
2
دانشجوی دکترای جامعهشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز. آدرس پستی: استان فارس، شیراز، میدان ارم، دانشگاه شیراز، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، بخش جامعهشناسی. کدپستی: 7194685115
AUTHOR
ایمان، محمدتقی (١۳۹١)، فلسفۀ روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
1
Adorno, Theodor (1993), Hegel: Three Studies, Translated by Shierry W. Nicholsen, USA: The MIT Press.
2
Adorno, Theodor (2005), Minima Moralia:Reflections on a Damaged Life, Translated by E. F. N. Jephcott, London and New York: Verso.
3
Adorno, Theodor (2006), History and Freedom: Lectures 1964–1965, Translated by Rodney Livingstone, UK: Polity Press.
4
Adorno, Theodor (2007), Negative Dialectics, Translated by E. B. Ashton, London: Continuum.
5
Adorno, Theodor (2008), Lectures on Negative Dialectics: Fragments of a Lecture Course 1965/1966, Translated by Rodney Livingstone, UK: Polity Press.
6
Agamben, Giorgio (2011), The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government (Homo Sacer II, 2), Translated by Lorenzo Chiesa and Matteo Mandarini, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7
Foucault, Michel (1978), The History of Sexuality: Volume 1: An Introduction, Translated by Robert Hurley, New York: Pantheon Books.
8
Foucault, Michel (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, Translated by Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham and Kate Soper, New York: Pantheon Books.
9
Foucault, Michel (1986), The History of Sexuality: Volume 3: The Care of the Self, Translated by Robert Hurley, New York: Pantheon Books.
10
Foucault, Michel (1997), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Translated by Robert Hurley, New York: The New Press.
11
Foucault, Michel (2002), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London and New York: Routledge.
12
Foucault, Michel (2003), Society Must Be Defended:Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, Translated by David Macey, New York: Picador.
13
Foucault, Michel (2010), The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith, New York: Vintage Books.
14
Foucault, Michel (2014a), On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1979–1980, Translated by Graham Burchell, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
15
Foucault, Michel (2014b), Wrong-Doing, Truth-Telling: The Function of Avowal in Justice, Translated by Stephen W. Sawyer, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16
Habermas, Jürgen (1998), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Translated by Frederick Lawrence, UK: Polity Press.
17
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor (1989), Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments,Translated by John Cumming, New York: Continuum.
18
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal (2001), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
19
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The OriginaryFinitude of Timliness and the Disclosedness of Dasein in Heidegger’s Being and Time
In Being and Time, Heidegger does not specifically thematize the concept of finitude, but he assumes a specific ontological meaning for this concept which is made briefly explicit in the explanation of the priority of future in the authentic timeliness as the “originary finitude of timeliness”. In this paper, on the basis of the phenomenological absolute precedence of Dasein over all beings, the concept of originary finitude will be distinguished from the ordinary and ontical conception of finitude. The ontical conception of finitude is primarily related to the fact, that Dasein is situated in the middle of beings. The distinction between the ordinary and originary finitude is emphasized on the basis of the fundamental distinction between timeliness and Being within-time. The last distinction makes the primary difference between Being-in-the-world and Being within-the-world ontologically possible. Accordingly, the distinction between ontical and ontological finitude enables us to disclose the specific ontological meaning of finitude as the origin of timeliness by the interpretation of the relation between the exsistential analysis of death and the disclosedness of Dasein. The originary finitude will be reached in relation with the authentic future in timeliness and will be finally regarded as the condition of the possibility of the disclosedness and encountering
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62952_e49054e05818e7f08c310b2d716d5f41.pdf
2017-02-19
27
45
10.22059/jop.2017.62952
finitude
timeliness
future
disclosedness
possibility
Ahmad
Rajabi
rajabi_ahmad2@yahoo.de
1
Phd student
LEAD_AUTHOR
ذ
ن
mrbeheshti@ut.ac.ir
2
ل
AUTHOR
Apel, Karl-Otto (1991) Heidegger und das Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie. In: Martin Heidegger: Innen- und Außenansichten. (131-175) Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
1
Balttner, William D. (1999) Heidegger’s temporal Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2
Fleischer, Margot (1991) Die Zeitanalysen in Heideggers „Sein und Zeit“. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann
3
Heidegger, Martin (1997) Der Deutsche Idealismus (Fichte, Schelling und Hegel) und die philosophische Problemlage der Gegenwart (1929), GA 28, hrsg. von Claudius Strube, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
4
Heidegger, Martin (1975) Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1927) GA 24, hrsg. von F.W. von Herrmann, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
5
Heidegger, Martin (1996) Einleitung in die Philosophie (1928/29), GA 27, hrsg. von Otto Saame u. Ina Saame-Speidel, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
6
Heidegger, Martin (1991) Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (1929), GA 3, hrsg. von F.W. von Herrmann, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
7
Heidegger, Martin (1979) Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (1925), GA 20, hrsg. von Petra Jaeger, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
8
Heidegger, Martin (1977) Sein und Zeit (1927), GA 2, hrsg. von F.W. von Herrmann, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
9
Heinz, Marion (1982) Zeitlichkeit und Temporalität. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann
10
Tugendhat, Ernst (1970) Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter
11
Schulz, Walter (1994) Über den philosophiegeschichtlichen Ort Martin Heideggers. In: Heidegger – Perspektiven zur Deutung seines Werkes, hrsg. von Otto Pöggeler. (95-139) Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum
12
Wallau, Peter (2001) Endlichkeit in Heideggers Denken. Essen: Die blaue Eule.
13
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Analysis of the mutual relation between deconstractional interpretation of Plato’s viewpoint of truth and history of truth in Heidegger
Truth is one of the most important concepts in Heidegger’s thought. Its role is such prominent that the major part of Heidegger’s works can be interpreted on the basis of it. This paper tries to present a clear portrait from application of method of deconstruction on the history of truth through concentrating on Heidegger’s two works: Plato’s doctrine of truth and the essence of truth. Heidegger’s thesis in these works is to demonstrate how recognizing truth as unconcealment requires considering closely the deviation of meaning of truth through its history. It seems that clarifying Heidegger’s critique of Plato will bring to light one of his concepts i.e. history of truth. Main claim of this paper is to show there is a strict relation between Heidegger’s interpretation of Plato and his formation of the concept of history of truth. The overall goal of this paper is to elucidate and clarify Heidegger’s deconstructional interpretation of Plato through rereading of those two mentioned books. So our leading question is how Heidegger’s deconstructional interpretation of Plato finds its proper space to appear and what unexamined horizons this interpretation opens before us and what is its relation to history of truth.
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62959_bf4aaebafb2693154ec689484dff4a76.pdf
2017-02-19
47
66
10.22059/jop.2017.62959
truth
Heidegger
unconcealment
history of truth
deconstractural interpretation
Plato
seyed jamal
same
jamal_same68@yahoo.com
1
univercity of esfahan
LEAD_AUTHOR
mohammad javad
safian
m.j.safian@gmail.com
2
the manager of philosophy department in isfahan philosophy
AUTHOR
کریچلی، سایمون. (1387)، فلسفهی قارهای ترجمهی خشایار دیهیمی، تهران: نشر ماهی.
1
Dostal, Robbert. (1992). Beyend being: Heidegger's plato in christopher macaan. Martin Heidegger, critical assessments: Routledge.
2
Friedländer,Paul.(1969).Plato : an introduction. New York. Cambridge university.
3
Heidegger,Martin.(2002). The essence of truth, Translated by Ted Sadler, University press.
4
----------------------. (2003). Plato's sophist. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer. University press.
5
---------------------. (1992), Parmenides. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer, university press.
6
---------------------. (1994), Basic Questions of philosophy Translated by Richard Rojcewicz, continuum books.
7
---------------------. (1967), What is a thing? Translated by W.B. Barton and Wera Deutsch with an analysis by Eugen et Gendlin: Newyork Cambridge.
8
--------------------. (1996), Being and Time. Translated by Jean Stambaugh. Newyork: state university of Newyork press.
9
-------------------. (1998), Plato's Doctrine of Truth in William MC Neill. Martin Heidegger Path marks. Newyork: Cambridge university press.
10
Inwood, Micheal. (2002), Heidegger Dictionary. Oxford Black Well.
11
Sheehan, Thomas, (2002), Martin Heidegger in Edwart Craige. Routledge. Encyclopedia of philosophy. London and Newyork: Routledge.
12
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Deductive Stystem of Stoic Logic
The Stoics believed that valid arguments are reduced to “undemonstrated’s’’ through “thema’s”. This interpretation, implied by ancient authors, considers Stoic logic as an axiomatic system with argumental rules. On the basis of this view on Stoic logic, undemonstrated’s are used as axioms and Themas as transmission rules. Yet, SextusEmpiricus in his book, Against the Logicians, introduced two examples of Stoic reduction of valid arguments to undemonstrated’s in which he used undemonstrated’s as sentential rules. In this approach, undemonstrated’s are used as inference rules and Themas don’t play any different reasonable role than undemonstrated’ss; on the other words, undemonstrated’s and Themas are used as inference rules. Mates and Bochenski didn’t attention to this conflict and analyzed these two examples like Empiricus. This paper brings up this conflict and suggests two solutions for it. Based on first solution, Stoic logic has two various surfaces and in each surface, it includes one of argumental or sentential rules; Therefore argumental rules and sentential rules can be used simultaneously. In second solution, based on the historical development of Stoic logic, two mentioned interpretations are attributed to Stoics in different historical periods.
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62968_69276192e38ed8854833c20864e35b60.pdf
2017-02-19
67
84
10.22059/jop.2017.138343.1006207
Stoic Logic
Sextus Impiricus
Axiomatic System
“Undemonstrated”s
Themas
Amin
Shahverdi
amin.shahverdy@gmail.com
1
دانش آموخته دکتری فلسفه دانشگاه اصفهان
LEAD_AUTHOR
Bobzien, Susane (1996), “Stoic Syllogistic”, C. C. W. Taylor (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
1
Bocheński, I. M (1951), Ancient Formal Logic, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
2
Corcoran, John (1974), “Remarks on Stoic Deduction”, in Ancient Logic and Modern Interpretations, ed. John Corcoran, Dordrecht-Holland, D. Reidel Publishing Company.
3
Empiricus, Sextus (1976), Outline of Pyrrhonism, Trans. Rev. R. G. Bury (ed.) G. P. Goold, The Loeb Classical Library, Great Britain.
4
Empiricus, Sextus (2005), Against the Logicians, Trans. Richard Bett, Cambridge University Press, New York.
5
Empiricus, Sextus (2007), Outline of Sceptiticism, Trans. Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes, Cambridge University Press, New York.
6
Gould, Josiah (1974), “Deduction in Stoic Logic”, in Ancient Logic and Modern Interpretations, ed. John Corcoran, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland.
7
Laertius, Diogenes (1925), Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Trans. R.D Hicks, Vol. 2, The Loeb Classical Library, Great Britain.
8
Mates, Benson (1961), Stoic Logic, University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles.
9
Milne, Peter (1995), “On the Completeness of Non-Philonian Stoic Logic”, History and Philosophy of Logic, vol. 16, No. 1, p: 39-64.
10
Mueller, Ian, (1979), “The Completeness of Stoic Propositional Logic”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 20, No. 1, p: 201-215.
11
Nasieniewski, Marek, (1998), “Is Stoic Logic Classical”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 6, p: 55-61.
12
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Revelation and Knowledge in Socratic-Platonic Philosophy
Abstract In Plato’s dialogues, we find various “revelations” including Socrates’ customary divine voice or sign (i.e. his daimonion), his communication with divine realm through dreams and oracles, and the oracular and poetic divinations. Plato’s portrait of Socrates shows that Socratic revelations are monitions directing him according to divine wisdom throughout his life. However, his mantic powers do not make him cognizant of their epistemic source(s); thus, Socrates cannot remain independent of his philosophical way of searching knowledge. Furthermore, the prognostications of soothsayers and poets indicate their inspirations by the divinity; but they are not conscious of their prophecies, since they must enter an ecstatic and trancelike state before they become inspired. Through these prophetic predictions, people are forewarned in some important circumstances, but never partake of gods higher knowledge. Thus, in Socratic-Platonic view, there is a divine source for revelations and the human beings are led through them in the face of their problems; but none of the revelations bring the highest level of knowledge which the philosopher is looking for
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62949_30e9bfb384a72ca524393640ed8ca802.pdf
2017-02-19
85
102
10.22059/jop.2017.62949
Socrates
Plato
Revelation
Knowledge
Religion
philosophy
Iman
Shafibeik
ishafibeik@yahoo.com
1
دانش آموخته دکترای تخصصی فلسفه
LEAD_AUTHOR
شفیعبیک، ایمان (1392)، «معرفت شهودی در فلسفهی افلاطون»، جاویدان خرد 24: 81–104.
1
——— (1393)، «جهل سقراطی: معنای حقیقی یا مجازی؟»، شناخت 70: 195–224.
2
——— (1395)، «سقراط: اصلاحگرِ اخلاقی»، پژوهشهای فلسفی 19: 231–252.
3
لطفی تبریزی، محمدحسن (مترجم) (1367)، دورهی آثار افلاطون (ج 1–3، ترجمهی ج 1 با همکاری رضا کاویانی)، خوارزمی.
4
Avni, A. (1968), ‘Inspiration in Plato and the Hebrew Prophets’, Comparative Literature 20: 55–63.
5
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (1994), Plato's Socrates, Oxford University Press.
6
Burnet J. (ed.) (1900–1906), Platonis opera (vols i–iv), Oxford University Press.
7
Bussanich, J. (2006), ‘Socrates and Religious Experience’, in S. Ahbel-Rappe and R. Kamtekar (eds.), A Companion to Socrates, Blackwell: 200–13.
8
Büttner, S. (2011), ‘Inspiration and Inspired Poets in Plato's Dialogues’, in P. Destrée and F.-G. Herrmann (eds.), Plato and the Poets: 111–29.
9
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) (1997), Plato: The Complete Works, D. S. Hutchinson (assoc. ed.), Hackett.
10
Dodds, E. R. (1945), ‘Plato and the Irrational’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 65: 16–25.
11
(1973), The Greeks and the Irrational, University of California Press.
12
Gulley, N. (1952), ‘Ethical Analysis in Plato's Earlier Dialogues’, The Classical Quarterly 2: 74–82.
13
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1971), Socrates, Cambridge University Press.
14
Hamilton, E. and Cairns,H.(eds.) (1973), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Pantheon Books.
15
Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. (1996), A Greek-English Lexicon, revised and augmented by H. Stuart Jones, with the assistance of R. McKenzie and with the co-operation of many scholars, Oxford University Press.
16
Long, A. A. (2006), ‘How Does Socrates' Divine Sign Communicate with Him?’, in S. Ahbel-Rappe and R. Kamtekar (eds.), A Companion to Socrates, Blackwell: 63–74.
17
McPherran, M. L. (1996), ‘Socratic Reason and Socratic Revelation’, in W. J. Prior (ed.), Socrates: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers (vol. ii), Routledge: 167–94.
18
(2011), ‘Socratic Religion’, in D. R. Morrison (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Socrates, Cambridge University Press: 111–37.
19
Robin, L. (trad.) (1968), Platon: Œuvres complètes (2 vols, avec la collaboration de M.-J. Moreau), Paris.
20
Sedley, D. and Long, A. (eds.) (2011), Plato: Meno and Phaedo, A.Long (trans.), Cambridge University Press.
21
Tarrant, H. (2006), ‘Socratic Method and Socratic Truth’, in S. Ahbel-Rappe and R. Kamtekar (eds.), A Companion to Socrates, Blackwell: 254–72.
22
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
On Anachronism in the Historiography of Philosophy
Anachronism occurs in producing a historical account if the arrangement of story’s events is manipulated and misplaced. The main question of this article is whether avoiding anachronism in the historiography of philosophy is desirable, or even feasible? Some historical methodologists and philosophers, e.g. Quentin Skinner and MurtazaMutahhari respectively, consider anachronism as a historiographical mistake. This view is formulated under the theoretical framework of “the availability principle,” according to which no epistemic resources are allowed in historical interpretation that were unavailable in the time period under study. Problem-oriented historiography of philosophy would, consequently, face serious challenges. On the contrary, some other thinkers consider certain types of anachronism in historical narrative to be desirable or even inevitable. Among this group are Arthur Danto with his “Narrative Sentences,” and AhadFaramarzQaramaleki who makes sense of historical study as “understanding predecessors in the light of successors.” Arguments of the two opposing camps are discussed in this article, together with a number of considerations explored here for the first time. In conclusion, any response to the main question of our inquiry is argued to be dependent on the very conception of history adopted in the meta-historical framework by which the process of historiography is guided.
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62960_a2143913551687cbe6ede8d724098a1b.pdf
2017-02-19
103
122
10.22059/jop.2017.62960
anachronism
history of philosophy
historiography of philosophy
availability principle
Quentin Skinner
problem-oriented historiography
ئ
ئ
tahzib@yahoo.com
1
استادیار گروه فلسفه دانشگاه قم
LEAD_AUTHOR
فرامرز قراملکی، احد (1384). تاریخنگاری فلسفه، الزامها و رخنهها. خردنامه صدرا، شماره 41، 32–37.
1
فرامرز قراملکی، احد (1390)، روششناسی مطالعات دینی (تحریری نو)، چاپ ششم، مشهد: دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی.
2
گمینی، امیرمحمد (1389). تاریخنگاری علم به سبک ویگ. روششناسی علوم انسانی، شماره 62، 111–140.
3
مطهری، مرتضی (1352). نگاهی اجمالی به سیر فلسفه در اسلام. مقالات و بررسیها، شماره 13–16، 82–99.
4
مطهری، مرتضی (1390)، اصول فلسفه و روش رئالیسم (مقدمه و پاورقی)، جلد 3، چاپ نوزدهم، تهران: صدرا.
5
Bevir, Mark. 1994. Are there Perennial Problems in Political Theory? Political Studies 42: 662–675.
6
Danto, Arthur C. 1962. Narrative Sentences. History and Theory 2: 146–179.
7
Jardine, Nicholas (2000a), The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8
Jardine, Nick. 2000b. Uses and Abuses of Anachronism in the History of the Sciences. History of Science 38: 251–270.
9
Mackie, J. L. (1976), Problems from Locke, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10
Prudovsky, Gad. 1997. Can we Ascribe to Past Thinkers Concepts They had no Linguistic Means to Express? History and Theory 36 (1): 15–31.
11
Rée, Jonathan. 1986. Philosophy in History Edited by Richard Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner [Review]. History and Theory 25 (2): 205–215.
12
Rée, Jonathan. 1991. The Vanity of Historicism. New Literary History 22: 961–983.
13
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory 8: 3–53.
14
Skinner, Quentin. 1988. A Reply to My Critics. In J. Tully (ed.). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics (231–288). Cambridge: Polity Press.
15
Spoerhase, Carlos. 2008. Presentism and Precursorship in Intellectual History. Culture, Theory and Critique 49 (1): 49–72.
16
Williams, L. Pearce. 1975. Should Philosophers be Allowed to Write History? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26: 241–253.
17
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Origin of Beauty in Rumi Viewpoint
Muslim thinkers have discussed "Origin of beauty" and "Origin of enjoying the masterpieces of art" in their works and there is a long tradition of this problem in Western philosophy. In this discussion, philosophers have tried to explore the source of beauty inspiration to the artist, to make clear why and how the audience of the artwork understand beauty, and to provide a framework to discuss the "quality of understanding beauty". To answer to this problem, two main approaches are introduced. On the on hand, Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans believe that the origin of the beauty of art is its narration of the Spheres. According to this view, known as "Musicauniversalis,” the distance in music is equal to the distance between the sun and other planets, and enjoying art is resultedfrom understanding of the harmony of the Spheres. On the other hand, Muslim philosophers believe that the beauty of art is due to the narration of the beauty of heaven. Thedefenders of theory of "Representation of heaven" believe that human beings in their presence in heaven have tasted its beauty and in encountering the material beauties of this world,recollectthe heavenly beauty, and in fact, this association and remembrance is enjoyable for him. Rumi as a Muslim thinker, expresses both theories and apparently defends the second one.
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_62967_46acc1337abd7fceef2ce6ab48eca7fc.pdf
2017-02-19
123
142
10.22059/jop.2017.62967
: Beauty
imagination
Origin of Beauty
Origin of Enjoying the Masterpieces of Art
Theory of Narration
Rumi
Pythagoras
Hossein
Navvab
snavab@gmail.com
1
استادیار دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب
LEAD_AUTHOR
قرآن کریم
1
اخوان الصفا مجمل الحکمه [بخش کتاب] // سه رساله فارسی در موسیقی / مؤلف
2
کتاب الصفا اخوان / تدوین بینش تقی. - تهران : نشر دانشگاهی, 1371.
3
ارسطو بوطیقا (درباره هنر شعر) [کتاب]. - تهران : موسسه انتشارات حکمت, 1388.
4
ارسطو ما بعد الطبیعه (متافیزیک) [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات طرح نو, 1385.
5
اشراق شیخ حکمت الاشراق [کتاب]. - تهران : موسسه مطالعات و تحقیقات فرهنگى, 1372.
6
اعوانی غلامرضا مولانا و نظریه های ادبی مجموعه مقالات مولانا پژوهی دفتر دوم و چهارم [کتاب]. - تهران : موسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران, 1386.
7
افلاطون دوره آثار افلاطون [کتاب] / مترجم لطفی محمد حسن. - تهران : خوارزمی, 1380.- جلد 2 : 4.
8
افلوطین تاسوعات [کتاب]. - تهران : خوارزمی, 1389. - جلد 1.
9
باخرزی یحیی اوراد الاحباب و فصوص الآداب [کتاب]. - تهران : موسسه انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران, 1383.
10
بیانی شیرین دمساز دو صد کیش درباره مولانا جلال الدین [کتاب]. - تهران : جامی, 1384.
11
پورنامداریان تقی در سایه آفتاب [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات سخن, 1388.
12
جعفری محمد تقی تفسیر و نقد و تحلیل مثنوی جلال الدین محمد مولوی [کتاب]. - تهران : طلوع آزادی, 1363.
13
جعفری محمد تقی زیبائی و هنر از دیدگاه اسلام [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات شرکت سهامی چاپخانه وزارت ارشاد اسلامی, 1361.
14
جوادی آملی عبدالله اسرا [درون خطی] // جوادی. - اسرا, 2 اردیبهشت 1372. - 17 10 1392. -
15
چتیک ویلیام طریقه صوفیانه عشق [کتاب]. - تهران : مهر اندیش, 1384.
16
دورانت ویل و دورانت آریل تاریخ تمدن [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات علمی فرهنگی, 1378. - جلد 2.
17
دهباشی علی تحفه های آن جهانی سیری در زندگی و آثار مولانا جلال الدین رومی [کتاب]. - تهران : سخن, 1382.
18
ریاحی پری عقل از دیدگاه مولانا [کتاب]. - تهران : موسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران , 1384.
19
زارع مهدی کمپانی مولانا و مسائل وجودی انسان [کتاب]. - تهران : نگاه معاصر, 1390.
20
زرینکوب عبدالحسین نردبان شکسته [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات سخن, 1384.
21
سبزواری ملاهادی شرح مثنوی [کتاب]. - تهران : سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت ارشاد, 1375. - جلد 1 : 3.
22
سپهسالار فریدون بن احمد گنجینه حضرت مولانا- زندگینامه مولوی [کتاب]. - تهران : اقبال, 1388.
23
سرامی قدمعلی از خاک تا افلاک [کتاب]. - تهران : ترفتد, 1379.
24
سروش عبدالکریم قمار عاشقانه [کتاب]. - تهران : صراط, 1379.
25
شفیعی کدکنی محمد رضا موسیقی شعر [کتاب]. - تهران : نشر آگه, 1388.
26
شهروزی شرح حکمه الاشراق [کتاب]. - تهران : موسسه مطالعات و تحقیقات فرهنگى, 1372.
27
شیمل آنه ماری شکوه شمس (سیری در آثار و افکار مولانا جلال الدین رومی) [کتاب] / مترجم لاهوتی حسن. - تهران : انتشارات علمی فرهنگی, 1389.
28
عطار نیشابوری فرید الدین تذکره الاولیاء [کتاب]. - تهران : هرمس, 1388.
29
فروغی محمد علی سیر حکمت در اروپا [کتاب]. - تهران : زوار, 1381.
30
کاشانی حسن کنز التحف [بخش کتاب] // سه رساله فارسی در موسیقی. - تهران : نشر دانشگاهی, 1370.
31
کاشانی محمود بن علی عز الدین مصباح الهدایه و مفتاح الکفایه [کتاب]. - تهران : زوار, 1389.
32
گولپینارلی عبدالباقی مولانا جلال الدین زندگی، فلسفه، آثار و گزیده ای از آنها [کتاب] / مترجم سبحانی توفیق هاشم پور. - تهران : پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی, 1382.
33
محمدی کاظم مولانا و شعر [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات نجم کبری, 1385.
34
مدرسی(طباطبائی) سید محمد علی سماع، عرفان و مولوی - پژوهشی در تصوف و عرفان بررسی اندیشه های مولوی [کتاب]. - تهران : یزدان, 1378.
35
مولانا مقالات شمس [کتاب]. - تهران : مرکز, 1390.
36
مولوی مولانا جلال الدین محمد کتاب فیه ما فیه [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات نگاه , 1389.
37
نصر سید حسین جاودان خرد [کتاب]. - تهران : انتشارات سروش, 1382.
38
نصر سید حسین معرفت جاودان [کتاب]. - تهران : مهر نیوشا, 1386.
39
نصر سید حسین, چتیک ویلیام و شیمل آنه ماری گنجینه معنوی مولانا [کتاب]. - تهران : مروارید, 1384.
40
Fauvel John Music and Mathematics: From Pythagoras to Fractals [Book]. - London : Oxford University Press, 2006.
41
Murdoch Iris The Fire and the Sun [Book]. - Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1977.
42