منابع
ابن عربی، بیتا، فتوحات مکیه، ج 1، 2، 3 و 4، بیروت: دار الصادر.
_______، 1946 م، فصوص الحکم، قاهره: دار احیاء الکتب العربیه.
_________، 1378، ترجمان الاشواق، تهران: انتشارات روزنه.
رحیمیان، سعید: 1387، آفرینش از منظر عرفان، قم: بوستان کتاب.
صدرالمتألهین؛ 1981، اسفار اربعه، جلد دوم، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث.
قراملکی، احد- کریمی لاسکی، محمد؛ تحلیل مفهومی و گزارهای قاعده زرین اخلاق، ذهن، بهار 1396، شماره 69.
قونوی، صدرالدین؛ 1381، اعجاز البیان فی تفسیر امّ القرآن، قم: دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی.
قیصری، داود؛ 1375، شرح فصوص، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
کاشانی، عبدالرزاق؛1370، شرح فصوص، قم: انتشارات بیدار.
Abdollahi J. (2023). Epistemological Comparison of Rational Disagreement in Kuhn and Feyerabend Viewpoints. Philosophical Thought; 3 (4) :357-378. [Persian]
Christensen, D. (2013), Epistemic modesty defended. In: The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. David Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Conee, E. (2009) Peerage. Episteme 6, no. 3: 313– 23.
Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Scientific explanation, space and time, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. III, pp. 28–97). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1968). Outline of a pluralistic theory of knowledge and action. In S. Anderson (Ed.), Planning for diversity and choice (pp. 275–284). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1975a), Against method (1st ed.). London: Verso Books.
Feyerabend, P. (1975b). How to defend society against science. Radical Philosophy, 11(1), 3–8.
Feyerabend, P. (1978). Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Books.
Feyerabend, P. (1981) Reply to criticism: comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam. In: Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press: 104-131.
Feyerabend, P. (1999a). Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction Versus the Richness of Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feyerabend P. (1999b). Preston J. Paul K. Feyerabend: Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Cambridge University Press.
Feldman R. (2007), “Reasonable Religious Disagreements”, In: Philosophers Without God: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life, Antony L (ed) ,Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 194-214
Kidd, I. (2012), Feyerabend, Pseudo-Dionysius, and the Ineffability of Reality. Philosophia 40, 365–377 (2012)
Kraft, J. (2021), Incommensurability and Wide-Ranging Arguments for Steadfastness in Religious Disagreements: Increasingly Popular, But Eventually Complacent, Topoi 40, 1147-1159
Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. Broadview Press.
Shaw, J. (2017), Was Feyerabend an anarchist? The structure(s) of ‘Anything Goes’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 64, 11–21.
Taghavi, M. (2016). The Origins of Feyerabend’s Anarchistic Epistemology. Philosophy of Science, 6(2), 1-14. [Persian]
Zivyar, F., Jebraily, S. Y., & Etemadi Bozorg, A. (2019). Feyerabend; myth-making myth-maker from the universal critique of science and religion to pluralism and the majority vote. Science and Religion Studies, 10(1), 145-160 [Persian]
