Philosophy

Zagzebski's Moral Theory: Exemplarist Virtue Theory

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

Shima Shahriyari 1
Mohammad Hossein Navvab 2

1 Ph.d. Student in Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran

2 Assistant Professor in University of religions

https://doi.org/10.22059/jop.2015.56690
Abstract
Linda Zagzebski presents a new kind of foundational moral theory in her exemplarist virtue theory which exemplary persons have considered as the foundation. In this theory all of the basic moral concepts such as good ends and right acts are defined by direct reference to paradigmatically good person. One of the most important consequences of this theory is that moral propositions are a posteriori and because of that the theory gives special attention to narrative ethics. By emphasizing the significant functions of emotions in morality, Zagzebski tries to show that paradigmatically good persons are identified by the emotion of admiration. She believes that the emotion is a kind of perception that has both cognitive and affective aspects. Since this theory is based on the attractiveness of the good, it can provide an attractive foundation for ethics. Because of this matter, Zagzebski considers this theory better and more justifiable than other moral theories. This article seeks to give a brief review of Zagzebski's moral theory, express the considerations of other philosophers about her theory and in the end show the important problems that undermine the justifiability and acceptability of it.
 

Keywords

: exemplarist virtue theory
Virtue
exemplary good person
Emotions
Zagzebski

 

 

منابع

گمپرتس، تئودور(1375)، متفکّران یونانی. ترجمه محمّد حسن لطفی، تهران: خوارزمی، جلد3.
Adams, Robert Merrihew (2006), Review of Divine Motivation Theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. International Phenomenological Society, September ,Vol. 73. pp. 493-496.
Carson, Thomas L. (2007), Review of Divine Motivation Theory. Mind Assiciation. Junuary, Vol. 116, pp. 254-257.
Hare, John (2005), Review of Divine Motivation Theory [Online] // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Junuary. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24314-divine-motivation-theory/.
Putnam, Hilary (1975), Mind, Language and Reality (Philosophical Paperrs). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 2.
Stohr, Karen (2006), Review of Divine Motivation Theory. The Philosophical Quarterly. Blackwell Publishing, October, Vol. 56, pp. 629-632.
Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus (1996a), Virtues of the Mind, New York: Cambridge University Press.
______ (1996b), “An Agent-Based Approach to the Problem of Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Springer, January, Vol. 39, pp. 127-139.
______ (2002), “The Incarnation and Virtue Ethics.” In The Incarnation, ed. Davis Stephen T, Kendall Daniel and O'Collins Gerald. New York: Oxford University Press.
______ (2004), Divine Motivation Theory, Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.
______ (2005), “Morality and Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosiphy of Religion, ed. Wainwright William J.. New York: Oxford University Press.
______ (2006), “The Admirable Life and the Desirable Life.” In Values and Virtues:Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics, ed. Chappell Timothy. New York: Oxford University Press.
______ (2009), “The Virtues of God and the Foundations of Ethics.” In ‎Readings in philosophy of religion, ed. Miller Timothy D. and Linda Zagzebski Trinkaus, New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
______ (2010), “Exemplarist Virtue Theory.” Metaphilosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, January 11, Vol. 41, pp. 41–57.
______ (2013), “Moral exemplars in theory and practice.” Theory and Research in Education, Sage, Junuary 6, pp. 1-14.

  • Receive Date 22 February 2015
  • Revise Date 21 August 2015
  • Accept Date 06 September 2015

Home

Contact Us