Document Type : Scientific-research
Author
Department of theology and Islamic philosophy Payame Noor university Tehran Iran
Abstract
Based on the descriptive-analytical method, this article focuses on the phenomenological function of intuition of essence in Descartes and Husserl. Although the author introduces intuition as a common methodological process for them, he observes clear differences between them. In the Rules of Guidance of the Mind, for Descartes, intuition is a perception arising from the light of pure reason, whose immediacy and delicacy, contrary to temporal inference, leave no room for skepticism and can be an effective expression for pure rationalism, through which it suspends the authority of imagination and senses. By emphasizing the delicacy and inherent obviousness of intuition, firstly, the truth of temporal inference becomes dependent on intuition. Secondly, with the help of intuition, one can go beyond the temporal "that" and pass through perceptual pointlessness in order to ensure the continuity of intuitive certainty.Thirdly, by developing the possibilities of intuition, he achieves the intuitive perception of "relations".However, for Husserl in Cartesian Meditation, the structure of intuition, which is a kind of intellectual journey, It is introduced as merely a signifier, not a mode of representation, it is a temporal matter that begins with the pure subject. But it relies on the intentional aspect, that is, on the solidarity of the pure subject with its objects, and the pure subject does not exist. Husserl achieved important achievements by making this change in the structure of intuition. First, he achieved the obviousness and temporality of intuition by relying on the transcendental subject, which is the existential condition of objects.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)