Some Considerations on the Scholastic Transcendental Philosophy in the Light of the Metaphysics of Avicenna, Aquinas, and Scotus

Talebzadeh, Seyed Hamid; Attarzadeh, Ali Reza

doi:10.22059/jop.2025.401203.1006945

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

¹ Professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

² . Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jop.2025.401203.1006945

Abstract

A set of concepts lies at the core of metaphysical thought, constituting the subject and predicate of most metaphysical propositions. The centrality of these metaphysical concepts, referred to in later Islamic philosophy as (philosophical) "secondary intelligibles" and in Scholastic philosophy as "transcendental concepts," was not recognized from the outset of the history of metaphysics. Rather, their prominence emerged under specific conditions shaped by Avicenna’s metaphysics. Scholastic philosophers, building on Avicenna’s innovations, further developed discussions concerning these concepts, and ultimately, Duns Scotus designated metaphysics as the science of transcendentals, and structuring its components based on his understanding of transcendental concepts. In this article, with reference to the metaphysics of Avicenna, Aquinas, and Scotus, and emphasizing their intellectual commonalities, we aim to propose a general framework for Scholastic transcendental philosophy. The rationale for selecting these three philosophers lies in the fact that Avicenna is the primary source of issues related to transcendentals; Aquinas introduced new issues in addition to Avicennian themes; and Scotus was the first to explicitly designate metaphysics as the science of transcendentals. In this paper, we first address the subject of metaphysics, its components, and the role that transcendental concepts may occupy within the metaphysical frameworks proposed by these philosophers. Subsequently, we explore the definition of transcendental concepts, their classifications, their functions, as well as the shared claim among the discussed philosophers regarding the proof of the externality of transcendental concepts and the significance of this claim.

Keywords

Main Subjects

philosophy

References

Aertsen, Jan A. (1996). Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals. The Case of Thomas Aquinas, Leiden-New York-Köln: Brill.

…………………….. (2012). Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought. From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez, Leiden-Boston: Brill.

Aquinas, Thomas (1952). The Disputed Questions on Truth: Questions I-IX, trans. R. W. Mulligan, H. Regnery Company: Chicago.

……………………….. (1961). Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Trans. J. P. Rowan, Chicago: Regnery,

……………………….. (1955). On the truth of the Catholic Faith, Summa Contra Gentiles: Book One: God, Trans. Anton C. Pegis, Doubleday

………………………., (1947). The Summa Theologica, Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Benziger Bros.

................................... (2023). A Summa of the Summa, edited and annotated by Peter Kreeft, Trans Ali Reza Attarzadeh, Tehran: Qoqnoos.

Aristotle (1393), Metaphysics, tr. Sharaf-al-Din Khorasani, Tehran: Hekmat.

Copleston, Frederick (2011). A History of Philosophy, vol. 2, translated by Ibrāhīm Dādjū, Tehran: ‘Ilmī va Farhangī. (In Persian)

Dumont, S. D., (1992). “Transcendental Being: Scotus and Scotists”, in: Topoi 11, pp. 135–148.

………… (1992). Al-Mabāḥithāt, edited and annotated by Mohsen Bīdārfar, Qom: Bīdār. (In Arabic)

Gilson, Étienne (2016). History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages, translated by Rezā Gandumī Nasrābādī, Qom: Adyān va Mazāhib. (In Persian)

Gilson, Étienne (2018). John Duns Scotus: Introduction to his fundamental Positions, Trans James Colbert, T&T Clark.

Gracia, J. J. E., (1992). “The Transcendentals in the Middle Ages: An Introduction”, in Topoi 11, No. 2, pp. 113–120,

Ibn Sīnā (2011). Al-Ilāhiyyāt min Kitāb al-Shifā, edited and annotated by Hasan Hasanzādeh Āmulī, Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb. (In Arabic)

Ibn Sīnā (2011). Al-Mobāḥisāt, edited and annotated by Mohsen Bidarfar, Qom: Bidar. (In Arabic)

Janssens, J., (2003). “Elements of Avicennian Metaphysics in the Summa”, in: G. Guldentops / C. Steel (eds.), Henry of Ghent and the Transfomation of Scholastic Thought. Studies in Memory of Jos Decorte, Leuven 2003 (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, 31), pp. 41–59.

Maurer, Armand. (1982). Medieval Philosophy: an introduction, ‎ Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; 2nd ed.

Owens, J. (1994). An Elementary Christian Metaphysics, University of Notre Dame Press.

Scotus, John Duns (1997–98). Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, trans. Etzkorn, Girard J., and Allan B. Wolter, The Franciscan Institute.

………………………..., The Ordinatio of Blessed John Duns Scotus, trans. Peter Simpson, available on: http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Authors/Duns_Scotus/Ordinatio.

………………………..., (2016). On Being and Cognition: Ordinatio 1.3, ed and trans John van den Bercken, Fordham University Press: New York.

Surzyn, Jacek, (2013). “Scotus’ inspirations in Immanuel Kant’s transcendentalism”, Folia Philosophica 29, Edited by Piotr Laciak and Agnieszka Wesolowska, pp. 63—81.

Wahl, Jean (2001). Traite de Metaphysique, translated by Yaḥyā Mahdavī and colleagues, Tehran: Khwārazmī. (In Persian)

Wippel, J. F., (1990). “The Latin Avicenna as a Source of Thomas Aquinas’s Metaphysics”, in: Freiburger Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und Theologie 37, pp. 51–90.

Wolter, A. B. (1946). The Transcendentals and their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus, Franciscan Institute Publications.

Some Considerations on the Scholastic Transcendental Philosophy in the Light of the Metaphysics of Avicenna, Aquinas, and Scotus

References

References

Volume 23, Issue 2 - Serial Number 45February 2026Pages 203-223

Volume 23, Issue 2 - Serial Number 45
February 2026
Pages 203-223