Anthropological Tension: the Question of Human Essence and Metaphysics of Subjectivity in Kant

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 PhD Graduate of Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba’I u University

2 Associated Professor of western philosophy, Iranian Institute of Philosophy

Abstract

It is widely known that Kant refers all the three basic problems of philosophy to the single ultimate question “what is man?”, the task of finding a solution for which is assigned to the philosophical anthropology. One considers Critique of Pure Reason in this regard, however, one surprisingly finds that this question is entirely absent from Kant’s own magnum opus. By its very nature indeed, transcendental philosophy is incapable of arising this question thus formulated, since it eventually leads to a subject, not to a human being. Heidegger’s exegetical reading of Kant notwithstanding, one should not simply conclude, however, that the question of the essence of man eventuates by Kant in the formation of a metaphysics of subjectivity. Kant’s doctrine of transcendental unity of apperception is not so much a subject-centered metaphysical theory, of the sort that Heidegger assumes, as it denotes a transcendental formulation of Kant’s general anthropological conception. What lies at the core of this anthropological view is the twofoldness of human place in cosmos, in terms of which the tension between the marginality and, simultaneously, centrality of man in relation to the world can be articulated. We refer to this anthropological conception as “anthropological tension”, due to the irreducible duality that lies at its core.

Keywords

References

دیرکس، هانس (۱۳۹۱)،  انسان‌شناسی فلسفی، ترجمۀ محمدرضا بهشتی، تهران، هرمس.
یوئینگ، ای. سی. (۱۳۸۸)،  شرحی کوتاه بر نقد عقل محض کانت، ترجمۀ اسماعیل سعادتی خمسه، تهران، هرمس.
 
Carr, David (1999), The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition, New York, Oxford University.
Courtine, Jean-François (1990), Heidegger et la phénoménologie, Paris, Librairie Philosophique Vrin.
Heidegger, Martin (1984), Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen (GA 41), hrsg. P. Jaeger, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, Martin (1991), Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (GA 3), hrsg. F.-W. von Herrmann, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann.
Henrich, Dieter (1967), Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann.
Husserl, Edmund (1976), Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, hrsg, von Walter Biemel, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Kant, Immanuel (1956), Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Nach der ersten und zweiten Original-Ausgabe, hrsg. von Raymund Schmidt, Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Kant, Immanuel (1968), Logik. Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen. Herausgegeben von Gottlob Benjamin Jäsche, Akademie-Ausg. Bd.IX, de Gruyter, Berlin.
Kemp Smith, Norman (2003), A Commentary to Kant's “Critique of Pure Reason”, with a new introduction by Sebastian Gardner, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Lichtenberger, Hans P. (2014), “’Bürger Zweier Welten’ oder ‘Herr und Knecht’? Kant und Hegel zu einer Problem des Menschen”, Was ist der Mensch? Theologische Anthropologie im interdisziplinären Kontext, hrsg, Von Michael Graf, Frank Mathwig, Matthias Zeindler, Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 177-190.
     Marino, Gordon (2004), Basic Writings of Existentialism, New York, The Modern Library.
Müller, Klaus (2006), Glauben Fragen Denken, Band I: Basisthemen in der Begegnung von Philosophie und Theologie, Münster, Aschendorff.
ـــــــــــــ (2010), Glauben Fragen Denken, Band III: Selbstbeziehung und Gottesfrage, Münster, Aschendorff.
Pitte, Frederick P. Van (1971), Kant as Philosophical Anthropologist, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Rentsch, Thomas (2003), Heidegger und Wittgenstein: Existential- und Sprachanalysen zu den Grundlagen Philosophischer Anthropolgie, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.
Wood, Allen W. (2001), Basic Writings of Kant, New York, The Modern Library.
Schnädelbach, H. (1992), „Philosophieren nach Heidegger und Adorno“, Zur Rehabilitierung des animal rationale, Vorträge und Abhandlungen 2, Frankfurt a.M. 307-328.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 25 September 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 13 February 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics