Document Type : Scientific-research

Author

Assistant Professor , Department of Islamic Philosophy and Contemporary Wisdom, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran. Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jop.2022.346769.1006732

Abstract

Mullā Ṣadrā, in a discussion like the relationship between the constant and the changing, insists on constancy of the change and says that the movement is something that its being changed is identical with constancy: because everything – whatever that may be – is of constancy, although its constancy be merely constancy in being changed. In other words, there is something constant in the changing things and the changing is constant in its own changing. Thus, the changing things are related to the constant from the very constant aspect. He sometimes considers this constancy as a kind of four–dimensionalism and does not regard this four–dimensionalism to be inconsistent with presentism. Now, this important problem appears that how much the paradoxical expressions such as “constancy of the change” and ‘combination of four–dimensionalism with presentism’ are acceptable. The main purpose of the essay is to critically study the very Ṣadrian version of constancy of the change in the constant–changing relation and similar discussions. We will see that Ṣadrian commentators have had different reactions to such expressions as constancy of the change: Some, like ʻAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāyī, have accepted it and some, like Muṭahharī and Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, have not. The criticism of Muṭahharī and Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, shortly speaking, is the claim that constancy of the change is abstract and mental property not external one and that it is conceptual not extensional. We will continue to criticize the evaluations of Muṭahharī and Miṣbāḥ Yazdī: if there is not some kind of constancy in the external world as the truth–maker, our mind cannot apply the concept of constancy about the external changings. Finally, we will focus on the logical structure of the discussion in our special critique of constancy of the change to show that Ṣadrian version of constancy of the change is not merely a paradox but arguably a real contradiction. The reason is that, if the logical structures of (A) “the changing in its own changing is constant (and not changing)” and (B) “the changing in its own changing is not constant (but is changing)” are new logical structures such as (C) “x in its own being x is not x” and (D) “x in its own being x is x”, then it is resulted that (B) “the changing in its own changing is changing (and not constant)” to be true and therefore a controdiction to be appeared: both (A) and its contradictory, (B), are true. So, there is something in the material world that is controdictorily both constant and changing – while such resolutions as the difference in aspect are not applicable in the case of this contradiction. But, if, on the contrary of Ṣadrian Philosophy, we consider constancy of the change merely as an external time permanence and does not confuse this time permanence with real constancy, there will not emerge the non–material constancy contradictorily from this intensity of the change.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Assadi, Mahdi (2015), “The Objective Truth-Maker of the Logical Secondary Intelligible: A Case Study of the Absolute Non–Existent Paradox”, Logical Study, Vol. 6, Issue 2, No. 12, 1-36. (In Persian)
ـــــــــــــ  (2022a), “Studying Historical Precedence of Constancy of the Change in the Relationship between the Changing and the Constant”, History of Philosophy, Vol. 13, Issue 2, No. 50, 43–66. (In Persian)
ـــــــــــــ  (2022b), “A Critical Study of the Relationship between Non–Materiality of Knowledge and Constancy of Change”, The Mirror of Knowledge, Vol. 22, Issue 2, No. 71, 57-78. (In Persian)
Fanāyī Ishkawarī, Muḥammad (2009), ʻIlm uūrī, Qum, Muʼassasah–ʼi Āmūzishī va Pazhūhishī–ʼi Imām Khumaynī. (In Persian)
Ḥāʼirī Yazdī, Mahdī (2015), Shar arakat Asfār, Edited by Murtaḍā Pūyān, Tehran, Ḥikmat. (In Persian)
Ḥaydarī, Kamāl (2005), Durūs fī al-ikmah al-Muta'ālīyah: Shar Kitāb Bidāyat al-ikmah, Vol. 1., Qum, Dār Farāqid. (In Arabic)
Jawādī Āmulī, ‘Abd Allāh (2007), Raḥīq Makhtūm: Shar ikmat Mutaʻālīyyah. Vol. 15, Edited by Ḥamīd Pārsānīyā, Qum, Isrāʾ. (In Persian)
Javareshkian, ʻAbbas (2001), “A Critical Study in the Problem of the Immuable - Mutable Relation Based on the Substantial Movement Theory”, Religious Thought, Vol. 2, Issue 1 & 2,  No. 5 & 6, 75-94. (In Persian)
Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, Muḥammad Taqī (2011), Āmūzish Falsafah (Mishkāt), Vol. 2. Qum, Muʼassasah–ʼi Āmūzishī va Pazhūhishī–ʼi Imām Khumaynī. (In Persian)
ـــــــــــــ (2014), Taʻlīqah ʻalā Nihāyat al-ikmah, Qum, Muʼassasah–ʼi Āmūzishī va Pazhūhishī–ʼi Imām Khumaynī. (In Arabic)
Muḥīṭī Ardakān, Muḥammad ʻAlī (2017), “Barisī Tabyīn Sarayān Idrāk dar Hastī bā Tawajjuh bi Ḥiythīyyat Tajarrudī Māddīyyāt dar Ḥikmat Mutaʻālīyyah”, Ma‘rifat-i Falsafī, 14(4), 49-64. (In Persian)
Muṭahharī, Murtaḍā (1984), Naqdī bar Mārksīsm, Tehran, Ṣadrā. (In Persian)
Muṭahharī, Murtaḍā (2013), The Collected Works, Vol. 12, Tehran, Ṣadrā. (In Persian)
Shīrāzī (Mullā Ṣadrā), Ṣadr al–Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm (1981) al–ikmah al–Mutaʻālīyyah fī al–Asfār al–Arbaʻah al–ʻAqlīyyah [The Transcendent Philosophy of the Four Journeys of the Intellect], Vol. 1, 3 & 5, Bayrūt, Dār Iḥya al–Turāth al–ʻArabī. (In Arabic)
Shīrāzī (Mullā Ṣadrā), Ṣadr al–Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm (1987) Shar Uūl al-Kāfī, Vol. 3 & 4, Edited by Muḥammad khājawī, Tehran, Wizārat Farhang wa Āmūzish ʻĀlī, Muʼassasah Muṭālaʻāt wa Taḥqīqāt Farhangī. (In Arabic)
Sider, Theodore (2002), Four–Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time, Oxford, Oxford University.
Ṭabāṭabāyī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn (2009), Nihāyat al–Ḥikmah, Vol. 2, Edited with a Commentary by: ʻAbbās ʻAlī Zāri‘ī Sabzawārī, Qum, Muʼassasat al–Nashr al–Islāmī. (In Arabic)
Ṭabāṭabāyī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn (2007), Nihāyat al–Ḥikmah, Vol. 4, Edited with a Commentary by: Ghulām Riḍā Fayyāḍī, Qum, Muʼassasah–ʼi Āmūzishī va Pazhūhishī–ʼi Imām Khumaynī. (In Arabic)
Ṭabāṭabāyī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn (2004), al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʼān, Vol. 17, Qum, Manshūrāt Jāmiʻat al-Mudarrisīn fī al-Ḥawzah al-ʻIlmīyyah. (In Arabic)
Ṭabāṭabāyī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn (2009), Barrisīhāyi Islāmī, Vol. 2, Qum, Būstān Kitāb. (In Persian)
Zīnatī, ʻAlī (2012), Guftimān Rushangar Darbāriyi Andīshihāyi Bunyādīn: Munāiriyi Isān abarī, ʻAbd al-Karīm Surūsh, Farrukh Nigahdār, Muammad Taqī Mi Yazdī, Qum, Muʼassasah–ʼi Āmūzishī va Pazhūhishī–ʼi Imām Khumaynī. (In Persian)