Document Type : Scientific-research

Author

Professor, Department of Religions and Mysticism, , Iranian Institute of Philosophy, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jop.2022.336775.1006686

Abstract

The issue of stagnation or lack of progress in Islamic culture and civilization and its causes is one of the main issues that modern Muslim intellectuals have addressed and elaborated from various perspectives. Most of them believe that the main obstacle is Islamic philosophy(hekmat) and mysticism, which have hindered the progress of Islamic countries compared to the so-called Western countries. This research does not focus on the well-known factors such as scientific, social, political and geographical factors that are usually relevant for the development of civilization and culture. Rather, it investigates and analyzes this issue by arguing that the concepts of progress, civilization and culture are novel and modern concepts that are based on specific (modern) philosophical principles that originated and spread in Europe and have no precedent in any civilization and thought of non-European peoples, including Islam, even in the Christian Middle Ages. It is a novel initiative that was launched in the Western world history, and in essence, neither Islamic, Christian, nor Chinese or Indian wisdom and mysticism have obstructed its emergence. Contrary to what is claimed, in the pre-modern era, the source and basis of what is called culture and civilization in the modern era, for example in the Islamic world, were their wisdom and mysticism. To do this, the article first provides the historical background of the advocates of this opinion, who saw themselves as religious reformers or the so-called Islamic Protestants, such as Sayyed Jamaluddin Asadabadi. It also explains the history of the main concepts of this opinion, namely civilization, culture and progress, in the modern Western thought and their novelty in the non-modern thought and among the predecessors. It deals with the teachings of the great mystic Rumi as the one who is wrongly labeled as an opponent of science.The article also gives some examples of how the views of two Muslim philosophers, one from the west, Ibn Rushd, and the other from the east, Mirfenderski, could have contributed to the emergence of modern science and technology among Muslims, but they did not. The study concludes that this opinion and judgment is fundamentally flawed and is mainly due to the lack of comprehension of the foundations and principles of modern thought and secondly, Islamic philosophy and mysticism.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Burtt, Edwin Arthur (1925), the Metaphysical Foundation of Modern Science, London,  Routledge.
Hans Blumenberg (1986) The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, trans. by Robert M Wallace,Cambridge, the MIT press.
Dictionary of the History of Ideas (1973), ed. by philip p. Wiener Vol. IV, N. Y., New York, Charles Scribner's sons.
Heidegger, Martin (2000), Introduction to Metaphysics, tr. by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt,  New Haven, London, Yale University.
ـــــــــــ (1972), “The Age of the World Picture”, The Ouestion Concerning  Technology and other Essays, trans. By William Lovitt, Harper & Row, New York.
Löwith, Karl (1949), Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History,Chicaqo, University of Chicago.
Strauss, Leo, (1953), Natural Right and History, Chicago, University of Chicago press.
Kuhn, Thomas, (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,  Chicago, University of Chicago
Turner, Bryan S.( 1998), Max Weber Classic Monographs, Vo. III: Weber and Islam, Routledge.
ـــــــــــ (1981), “Progress or Return: The Contemporary Crisis in Western Civilization”, Modern Judaism, Vol., No.1, 1981, PP.17-45.