Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

10.22059/jop.2023.347526.1006735

Abstract

In contrast to other theories, the theory of holistic view has not been properly considered in Islamic philosophy, especially transcendental wisdom. The ideas about the existence of the whole or the total as something derived from individuals, in order to confirm or reject its real existence, are implicitly acceptable during some issues that arise in the Supreme Wisdom and according to their requirements. Exploring these related theories gives two conflicting positions of Mulla Sadra's theory about the being of the "whole": Some expressions clearly express the negation of the existence of the whole, Mulla Sadra, in the position of criticizing Ibn Sina's proofs of the falsification of sequence and Suhrodi's proof of necessity, which take the existence of the whole as the premise of their proof, and also proofs It runs away from the plateau that has been set up to prove the existence of the whole and emphasizes that nothing but unity exists outside, and multiplicity is not compatible with existence. and others implicitly or explicitly acknowledge its existence. some other expressions of Mulla Sadra, contrary to the above opinion, are in line with the acceptance of the external existence of the whole; That is, his expressions have provided a platform for description and interpretation dependent on the external existence of the whole, each of which is examined in detail.  The present article aims to use analytical-critical method, after considering Mulla Sadra's conflicting expressions in this regard, by paying attention to the coordinates of the principle of gradation of being, to criticize her point of view and to verify the theory of holism. The result of the research shows that the belief in the existence of the whole is one of the essentials of the principle of gradation of being. Longitudinal and latitudinal multiplicity that exists with regard to the three basic components of the principle of suspicion; That is, unity, multiplicity and objectivity of both can be explained, it shows the true existence of the whole as certain and its negation and the exclusivity of the existence of the whole in the existence of its individuals is incompatible with the coordinates of existence. The whole is a mental validity that is considered by differentiating and considering the plurality of people and not the plurality of gradation, and in this mental and epistemological consideration, ontological explanations, including gradation, do not interfere much. If someone believes in the originality of the essence or the difference of existence in the external objective truth or has a special doubt or special gradation, can credit all of them. This mental validity does not have an objective realization, and this is different from plurality or unity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ibn Sina (1383), Al-Asharat and Al-Tanbihat; Along with the description of Khwaja Nasir al-Din Tusi and Qutb al-Din Razi, vol. 2, Qom, Nashr al-Balagha.) In Persian)
_____(1385), Theology of the Book of Healing, researched by Hasan Hassanzadeh Amoli, Ch. 2, Qom, Bostan Kitab.)In Persian)
_____(1405 AH), al-Shifa- Logic, vol. 2, Qom, Marashi Najafi. )In Persian)
Javadi Amoli, Abdullah (1375), Rahiq Makhtoum: Description of transcendental wisdom, edited by Hamid Parsania, vol. 1, ch. 2, Qom, Israa.) In Persian)
ــــــــــــــــ (2010), Rahiq Maktum: Description of Transcendent Wisdom, Editing Hamid Parsania, Vol. 8, Ch 4, Qom, Isra. )In Persian)
Roshan-Zamir, Mohammad Ebrahim (2013), “Investigation of the meaning of the expression of explanation of the whole thing on the comprehensiveness of the Qur'an”, Quranic teachings, Vol. 19, 35-60.) In Persian)
Zanoozi, Mullah Abdallah (1355), Lamaat Elahiya, Tehran, Iran's Hikmat and Philosophy Association. )In Persian)
Suhravardi, Sheikh Shahabuddin (1375), The collection of works of Sheikh Ashraq, revised by Henry Carbone, vol. 1, ch. 4, Tehran, Institute of Cultural Studies and Research. )In Persian)
Shirazi, Seyyed Razi (1383), lessons on the description of Sabzevari, Tehran, Hikmat. )In Persian)
Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein (1981), Commentary on al-Hikmah al-Mutaaliyyah fi al-Asfar al-Aqliyyah al-Araba, vol. 2, Beirut, Dar al-Ahiya al-Tarath al-Arabi. )In Persian)
Tusi, Khwaja Nasir al-Din (1405 A.H.), Takhis al-Mahsal, Beirut, Dar al-Awat. )In Persian)
Farshad, Mehdi (1362), Systemic attitude, Tehran, Amir Kabir. )In Persian)
Fayazi, Gholamreza (1387), What and Being in the Sadraei School, Qom, Hozva Research Institute and University. )In Persian)
Golshani, Mehdi (1364), “Horosology and Potentiality in Bohm's Quantum Physics”, Academy of Sciences, vol. 4, 97-110. )In Persian)
Motahari, Morteza (1382), Collection of works, vol. 2 and 6, ch. 9, Tehran, Sadra. )In Persian)
Mulla Sadra (1302), Al-Tisa'a collection of letters, Tehran, Bina. )In Persian)
ـــــــــــــــــــــــ (1360), Al -Shohad al -Rabubi fi al -Mahj al -Saluki, Correction and Suspension of Seyyed Jalaluddin Ashtiani, Ch 2, Mashhad, Al -Majid al -Jama'i. )In Persian)
_________(1376), Commentary on the message of Al-Mashir, Commentary by Mohammad Jaafar Lahiji and edited by Seyyed Jalaluddin Ashtiani, Tehran, Amir Kabir. )In Persian)
_________ (2012 AH), Description of Sufficient Principles, Tehran, Al -Mahmoudi School. )In Persian)
_________(1981), al -Hikam al -Mutal'i al -Asfar al -Aqli al -Arba, vol. 1, 2, 4 and 6, Ch 3, Beirut, Dar al -Tharath. )In Persian)
_________(Bita), Al-Hashiya Ali Al-Hiyat al-Shifa, Qom, Bidar. )In Persian)
Mirdamad, Mohammad Baqer (1385-1381), Mirdamad's works, under the care of Abdullah Noorani, Tehran, Association of Cultural Artifacts and Scholars. )In Persian)
Hashempour, Aysouda and Mohammad Bidhandi (1401), “Critical examination of Sadrul Matalhin's theory about the existence of totality with an emphasis on the system of concepts in her philosophy”, Philosophical Knowledge, Q 19, No. 3, 41-56. )In Persian)
Hemti-Moghadam, Ahmadreza (2013), “Semantic generalism and medical language, discussion in the field of philosophy of medicine”, Menhad, vol. 18, 59-68. (In Persian)