Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Iran.

10.22059/jop.2024.373761.1006825

Abstract

The concept of the thing in itself in Kant's philosophy is the element which deprives us of knowing the thing as it is in itself. Hegel, who believed that knowledge is limited by nothing but itself, had to eliminate the thing in itself in his Absolute Idealism and in this way make his concept of Knowledge absolute. Many scholars believe that he did so in the first part of his Phenomenology of Spirit, titled 'Consciousness'. In this paper, in contrast to other studies which are concerned with Hegel's external critique of this concept and what he has said about it here or there in his System of philosophy, we'll examine his internal encounter with the Thing in Itself as it is occurred in the first chapter of the Phenomenology of Spirit. In doing so, we will try to show why he believed that, if we pursue the process of sublating the shapes of consciousness into one another, there won't be anything like the Thing in Itself.  Then We will attempt to explain why his efforts are futile and why, even in the Phenomenology of Spirit, the thing in itself exists exactly in the sense that Kant meant by the term.

Keywords

Main Subjects

منابع
Chadwick, Ruth f, Clive Cazeaux (1992). Immanuel Kant: critical assessments. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Chipman, Lauchlan (1973). Things in themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 33(4), 489-502.
Devries, William A. (1988). Hegel on Reference and Knowledge. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26(2), 297-307.
Harris, Henry Silton (1997). Hegel's Ladder: Volume I: The Pilgrimage of Reason. Volume II: The Odyssey of Spirit. United States: Hackett Publishing Company, Incorporated.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (2018). Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated with Introduction and commentary by Michael Inwood, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press.
---------------------------------------- (2000). The Encyclopaedia Logic. United States, Hacker PUBLISHING COMPANY.
------------------------------------------- (2009). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Heidelberg Writings: Journal Publications. United States: Cambridge University Press.
------------------------------------------- (2010). The Science of Logic. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.
Inwood, M. J. (2002). Hegel. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of pure reason, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kainz, Howard (1988). Hegel's Phenomenology, Part I: Analysis and Commentary, Greece: Ohio University Press.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (2012). “omnis determinatio est negatio” - Determination, negation and self-negation in Spinoza, Kant and Hegel
Plumer, Gilbert (1980). Hegel on singular demonstrative reference. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 11.2: 71-94.
 Stern, Robert (2020). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Hegel and the Phenomenology of spirit. Translated by Mohammad Mehdi Ardebili, Mohammad Javad Syyedi. Tehran: Qoqnoos. [In Persian]
Westphal, Kenneth R. (2000). Hegel’s internal critique of naïve realism. Journal of Philosophical Research, 25, 173-229.
Westphal, Kenneth R. (2002). Sense Certainty, or Why Russell had no ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance, Hegel Bulletin 23.1-2: 110-123.
Westphal, M. (1968). In Defense of the Thing in Itself. Kant-Studien59 (1), 118.