Philosophy

Tracing Suhrawardi's Theory of the Immateriality of Imagination in the Works of Ibn Sina

Ali Asghar Jafari Valani; Donya Asadi Fakhrnezad

Volume 21, Issue 2 , March 2024, , Pages 15-36

Abstract

Sheikh Eshraq, by acknowledging the existence of various faculties for the soul and considering imagination as one of these faculties, he has aligned his perspective with Ibn Sina's ... Read More Sheikh Eshraq, by acknowledging the existence of various faculties for the soul and considering imagination as one of these faculties, he has aligned his perspective with Ibn Sina's view. Ibn Sina contends that all soul faculties, except the rational faculty, are material. Therefore, according to Ibn Sina, imagination, besides having its own material nature, is also impressed in a material locus. The faculty of imagination, based on the functions of "combination and elaboration," provides the necessary forms and meanings for reason to achieve intellectual perception. On the other hand, Sheikh Eshraq rejects the concept of the imaginative faculty and imaginal forms in the sense intended by Ibn Sina, considering imaginary forms as suspended images not located in any place or space. Although these forms occasionally manifest in appearances, those appearances should not be considered the actual place or space of those forms. In other words, Suhrawardi attributes imaginative perception, like all perceptions, to the immediate knowledge of the soul. Despite adhering to Ibn Sina regarding the corporeality of imagination, Suhrawardi views imaginal forms as independent, remaining, and existing in the "Greater Imagination" (Khayal Mutaqaddim). Although he designates the imaginative faculty as material, he doesn't find compatibility between the perceiver and the perceived and believes that the soul engages in perceiving imaginal forms through examples. Therefore, it seems that while Suhrawardi aligns with Ibn Sina's perspective to some extent, he diverges in various aspects of the imagination discourse. The researcher concludes that Suhrawardi's foundational thoughts in this discussion are rooted in his critical considerations of Ibn Sina's statements. Sheikh Eshraq, albeit not in a detailed and organized manner but generally, pays attention to the simplicity of imagination as the basis for criticisms in some of his works such as "Al-Mabahith" and "Tebi'at" in "Al-Shifa

Aesthetics Arguments from the Perspective of C .S. Louis

Maryam Seif; Farah Ramin

Volume 21, Issue 2 , March 2024, , Pages 61-78

Abstract

While discussions on beauty in the works of philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoreans, and others have been documented, it became a significant epistemological domain from the ... Read More

Human Knowledge of Objects from John Locke and Abd al-Razzaq Lahiji’s Viewpoints

Zahra Shahbazi Mahmouabadi; Majid Mollayousefi

Volume 17, Issue 1 , September 2019, , Pages 21-40

Abstract

The problem of knowledge and the level of human knowledge of objects is one of the important issues of the history of thought and philosophy. Abd al Razzaq Lahiji (1072 AH) and John ... Read More

Articles in Press

Current Issue

Volume 21 (2023)

Volume 20 (2022)

Volume 19 (2021)

Volume 18 (2020)

Volume 17 (2019)

Volume 16 (2018)

Volume 15 (2017)

Volume 14 (2017)

Volume 13 (2016)

Volume 12 (2014)

Volume 11 (2013)

Volume 10 (2012)

Volume 9 (2011)

Volume 8 (2010)

Volume 7 (2009)

Volume 6 (2008)

Volume 5 (2007)

Volume 4 (2006)

Volume 3 (2005)

Volume 2 (2004)

Volume 1 (2002)

Keywords = Epistemology

Tracing Suhrawardi's Theory of the Immateriality of Imagination in the Works of Ibn Sina

Abstract

Aesthetics Arguments from the Perspective of C .S. Louis

Abstract

Human Knowledge of Objects from John Locke and Abd al-Razzaq Lahiji’s Viewpoints

Abstract