Document Type : Scientific-research
Author
Independent Researcher and Lecturer in Philosophy
Abstract
This article provides a genealogical analysis of the phenomenological tradition, charting its dialectical evolution from Edmund Husserl’s quest for a pure, transcendental ego to the concrete, embodied subject of contemporary critical phenomenology. The central thesis is that critical phenomenology emerges not as a refutation of Husserl, but as a radical reinterpretation of his methods. This critical turn transforms the phenomenological subject from an ahistorical observer into a historically situated agent, thereby shifting the purpose of philosophical inquiry from securing epistemological certainty to enabling social emancipation. The analysis begins with Husserl’s project of establishing philosophy as a "rigorous science" through the phenomenological reduction (epoche), a method designed to isolate the universal structures of consciousness. It then identifies Maurice Merleau-Ponty as the pivotal figure who, by centering the lived body, transforms the epoche from a tool for bracketing reality into a method for de-naturalizing social norms. This politicized method allows for a critique of the "quasi-transcendental" structures of power—such as colonialism, patriarchy, and heteronormativity—that shape and constrain lived experience. The essay demonstrates the power of this approach through the work of Frantz Fanon on the "racial epidermal schema," Simone de Beauvoir on woman as "the Other," and Sara Ahmed on queer "orientation". Their analyses show how the subject is constituted through oppressive social situations, making a retreat to a pure, pre-social ego impossible. Ultimately, the paper concludes that this critical turn redefines philosophy’s ethical vocation. The act of describing an unjust world becomes inseparable from the project of changing it, repositioning the philosopher as a committed witness tasked with articulating marginalized experiences to foster transformative praxis.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)