نوع مقاله : علمی -پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شمال
2 عضو هیات علمی دپارتمان فلسفه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شمال
3 عضو هیئت علمی دپارتمان فلسفه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران شمال
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The twentieth-century prominent political thinker, Hannah Arendt, has gone through a very different course from his master, Martin Heidegger in presenting her viewpoints on the correlation between political action (praxis) and overcoming totalitarianism. Applying a phenomenological analysis of history, she surveys the human condition from the pre-Socratic era to now in order to illuminate this correlation. No need to mention Heidegger’s influential impact on her critical approach to western metaphysical tradition; however, she emphasizes the disclosure of the actors’ “who” through action and speech in the public sphere, contrary to Heidegger’s disclosure of Dasein as “Aletheia” or the revelation of the truth. To phrase it, Arendt is switching over “being” to “appearance” which is considered action and speech in her thought. Her emphasis on man’s presence and his interaction with the others in the plurality of the public sphere to liberate from the crisis of twentieth-century totalitarianism and alienation stands in contrast to the extravagant egoism and solipsism of Heideggerian Dasein that have been recognized and criticized by Arendt herself. The one which is albeit known as being-in-the-world according to Arendt, but it is considered as inauthentic if being presented in the plurality of Mitsein (being-with), having an “Idle Talk” with them and consequently falling into everydayness. Therefore, Dasein prefers to remain an “ideal self” in isolation and seclusion according to Arendt.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)